So before Lauren and I were together, I was dating a girl who we'll call Sam.
So be completely honest, I was pretty much miserable. Sam did not have a car, did not have a job, was not going to school, and was pretty clingy. The worst part? We didn't have any interesting conversations and she never got any of my jokes.
Suffice to say, I was not satisfied with Sam. According to Rusbult, Martz, and Agnew (1998), satisfaction can be explained with the following equation:
Satisfaction = Rewards - Costs - Comparison Level
Comparison Level (CL) refers to my expectations of my relationship with Sam given my knowledge of past relationships (Thibaut & Kelley, 1959). In this context, my CL was moderate. However, my costs were greater than my benefits, and thus my satisfaction was low. But because I thought I was being a good person and because I had already invested so much time, money, and energy, I stayed with her. According to social exchange theory, investments are factors, such as time and money, that one cannot get back if the relationship ends (Thibaut & Kelley, 1959). Because I had already invested so much, I thought I should stay with Sam even though my satisfaction was low.
That is, until I met Lauren. When Lauren entered my life, I was forced to consider the comparison level of alternatives (CLalt), or what I thought were the costs and benefits of dating Lauren rather than Sam and whether or not I thought a switch would be more beneficial (Thibaut & Kelley, 1959).
Lauren was independent, financially and emotionally, and even had a car! Plus, she appreciated my wit. According to Rusbult et al. (1998), commitment can be explained by the following equation:
Commitment = Satisfaction - CLalt + investments
So, even though my investments were great, my satisfaction was very low, my CLalt was enormous (thanks to Lauren). So, following social exchange theory, I decided to minimize my losses and drop Sam like it's hot.
In the context of my relationship with Sam, I was losing a lot: money, normal emotional and intellectual processing, and precious time. With Lauren, I would only have to pay for myself, we could have stimulating conversations, and she was a better prospective mate.
In the end, I'm glad I unknowingly utilized social exchange theory. I definitely maximized my profits/satisfaction and minimized my losses.
Rusbult, C.E., Martz, J.M., Agnew, C.R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391.
Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.





No comments:
Post a Comment